Developer tools
Testing a form means typing the same fake name, email and address again and again — and generic autofill guesses from the field name alone, ignores validation rules, and breaks on French or Arabic forms.
The result
93.5% of real-world fields filled correctly, in one click.
Testing a sign-up flow means typing the same name, email and address dozens of times a day. Generic autofill tools guess from the field name alone, so they put a phone number in a postcode box, ignore the field's own validation rules, and give up on forms written in French or Arabic.
Each field is scored on all the evidence it carries — its label, name, placeholder, autocomplete hint, units and, for a select, its options — and the form is read as a whole, so a confirmation field repeats the password and an end date lands after the start date. When the rules are unsure, a small model that ships inside the extension suggests a type, entirely offline.
The values are generated to pass: they respect each field's length and pattern, belong to one consistent person, and fill ARIA widgets and rich-text editors as well as plain inputs.
There is no DevFiller server. Settings stay in the browser's local storage and the extension never submits a form. The optional AI suggestions use your own Groq or Gemini key and send only descriptions of the fields — never the values on the page.
On about 500 real-world forms — 2,500 hand-labelled fields — DevFiller fills 93.5% of fields with a value that fits and gets 1.9% wrong. A thousand fields are classified in about 70 ms. It is published on the Chrome Web Store, Firefox Add-ons and Microsoft Edge Add-ons.
First call is free, 20 minutes
Write what is eating your time or losing you money. I reply within one working day with a plan and a price — and if I am not the right person, I will say so.
Questions about Haithem? Ask the assistant.